Friday, October 10, 2008

Vote for US, We'll Protect You from the Immigrants

Have you ever wondered why non-whites, non-Christians, and immigrants tend to vote for Democrats by a 3:1 ratio? I always thought it was because as far as political platforms go, the DNC tends to better articulate the role of government in assisting the have nots, i.e., the poor, immigrants, etc. whereas the RNC articulates the welfare of the haves and is more susceptible to rule by lobbyists. Liberal blog Open Left penned a revealing article explaining in socio-cultural terms exactly why the GOP's message of cultural, Eurocentric superiority permeates their political platform and campaign messages and has been so successful for them.
All throughout the 2008 Democratic primary campaign, the media made hay of the Democratic candidates using identity politics to win primaries, i.e., Black voters vs Latino voters, feminist voters, and "bitter" rural and poor, working class white voters, etc. However, it seems that Republican politicians have effectively used identity politics to great effect for some time with the message of protecting their constituents from "THEM". That is, Blacks, non-white immigrants, and other undesirables.

Several prominent examples that come to mind. In 2000, George W. Bush gained the Republican nomination for President in large part because of his racist attack against John McCain when Karl Rove and former SC Attorney General Charlie Condon released whisper polling in South Carolina claiming McCain had fathered a Black child out of wedlock.

The so-called Bradley Effect was coined because of a California gubernatorial race in which Tom Bradley, the popular Black Mayor of Los Angeles was widely expected to win due to favorable polling but ended up losing the race. Polling later showed white voters falsely told pollsters they would vote for a Black candidate to avoid criticism, and then did not, thereby benefitting his white GOP opponent. According to this theory, a Black political candidate must generally have a double digit lead over his opponent in order to overcome the hidden bias.

In 1996, Tennessee politician Harold Ford, Jr. had a great chance of becoming the first Black to win a US Senate seat since Reconstruction until his Republican challenger, Bob Corker, released an ad that played on the fact that Ford attended a Playboy Super Bowl party for 4,000 attendees and featured a naked blonde telling Ford to "call me" with the insinuation that this Black man will take your white women. Those of us in the Black community are well aware of the stereotype of Black men dating blonde women. Needless to say, the ad did enough damage to derail the candidacy of Ford, considered nationally to be the inevitable candidate.

In the past two years, the Democratic and Republican congressmen wrestled with passing so-called "immigration reform." A number of Republicans lined up against the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007 and helped to defeat passage by arguing against supposed "amnesty for illegals" when a number of the parts of the legislation to reform the immigration system was actually good. I want to know, since when did white Americans gain the right to bar "those other people" from entering their country? Every single person currently living in the United States either emigrated here from another country or have as ancestors people who called other countries and continents home, whether English, Dutch, German, Italian, Irish, Jewish, Spanish, certainly Africans, Asians, etc. That's why for many years this country has been called the "melting pot" of the world. So there really is no such thing as a "Real" American as many Republican ads would like us to believe because everyone here other than the Native Americans are from somewhere else!

No comments: